Hi all - I was starting to redo the dkms patch, but it looks like
Brian's taking that.

Thanks for the "Thanks".  :)   For future ref, I have email addresses on
my LP page, so this makes me wonder if they're properly visible.  There
are two, anyway, and <edward.dono...@numble.net> would be the better one
to use.  The launchpad@numble is where bug mail goes, for filtering.
Maybe that's not the smoothest way to do it.  (Maybe this process
question is best asked somewhere else; I don't know.)

I'm also a uncertain, after reading your comments, if the patches should
be redone, to work better with python 2 or 3, as you're talking about.
When there was a print statement in these hooks, my little patches just
made it a python 3 function, with parentheses.  I was just thinking
about python 3 compatibility, and didn't add any

    from __future__ import print_statement

lines.  Would it be best to redo them, that way?  Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013171

Title:
  Many package hooks not ported to python3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1013171/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Reply via email to