On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Walter Garcia-Fontes <walter.gar...@upf.edu > wrote:
> Sorry, this was not a generic message. I'm a user as yourself, and > Sorry, I'm tired of seeing bugs closed without any action on every new release. I thought it was such an effort. > upstream they don't even open the bug report if there is not a > stacktrace to check. > This is the reason why they will never fix it, and the reason why I'm actively looking for alternatives. A lot of time ago I stopped thinking that rhythmbox would ever get fixed. No stacktrace here, just 2 minutes unresponsive on every focus change on a Core I7. Regards Santiago > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247259 > > Title: > rhythmbox unresponsive every few seconds > > Status in “rhythmbox” package in Ubuntu: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > Since I updated to 13.10, rhythmbox is not usable. After it starts, it > freezes on every mouse click on different panes, sometimes it > recovers, sometimes it stays apparently forever "gray", and the dialog > to "wait or kill" appears. > > When I arrive to the point where I can "play", it remains unresponsive > and I cannot stop playing or switch songs. This was not happening > since I upgraded from 13.04 last week. > > Example output when I start it from command line: > > $ rhythmbox > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_model_get_iter_first: > assertion 'GTK_IS_TREE_MODEL (tree_model)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_combo_box_set_active_iter: > assertion 'GTK_IS_COMBO_BOX (combo_box)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_list_store_clear: assertion > 'GTK_IS_LIST_STORE (list_store)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_set_sensitive: > assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_combo_box_set_active: > assertion 'GTK_IS_COMBO_BOX (combo_box)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_label_set_markup: assertion > 'GTK_IS_LABEL (label)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_label_set_markup: assertion > 'GTK_IS_LABEL (label)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652ce0 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x17865c0 is not mapped > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652b00 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x1786220 is not mapped > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652ce0 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x17865c0 is not mapped > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652b00 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x1786220 is not mapped > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_model_get_iter_first: > assertion 'GTK_IS_TREE_MODEL (tree_model)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_combo_box_set_active_iter: > assertion 'GTK_IS_COMBO_BOX (combo_box)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_list_store_clear: assertion > 'GTK_IS_LIST_STORE (list_store)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_set_sensitive: > assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_combo_box_set_active: > assertion 'GTK_IS_COMBO_BOX (combo_box)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_label_set_markup: assertion > 'GTK_IS_LABEL (label)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_label_set_markup: assertion > 'GTK_IS_LABEL (label)' failed > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652b00 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x1786220 is not mapped > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652ce0 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x17865c0 is not mapped > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652b00 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x1786220 is not mapped > > (rhythmbox:12664): Gtk-WARNING **: RBPropertyView 0x1652ce0 is mapped > but visible child GtkScrollbar 0x17865c0 is not mapped > > at this stage it has remained gray and unresponsive for more than 2 > minutes and I don't know how to play music. I have a big collection > (almost 20000 songs), and rhythmbox has remained my player of choice > for its ability to handle this, but it is slowly changing (in 13.04 it > was very slow when it loosed and regained focus, like 10 seconds at > 100% CPU every time. Now it seems to last forever with 100% CPU... > > I can help with debugging, I'm a software developer. The machine where > I run it right now is an i7 with 4 cores, 8GB RAM and a fast SSD, so > performance should not be an issue. The same music collection was way > faster in 12.04 or 12.10... > > In 13.04 rhythmbox also stopped showing the performance year, which is > still there in the metadata. This is a separate bug that has not been fixed > in 13.10 :( > --- > ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 > Architecture: amd64 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-07-23 (256 days ago) > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtail" - Release amd64 > (20130424) > MarkForUpload: True > Package: rhythmbox 2.99.1-0ubuntu1 > PackageArchitecture: amd64 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-19.33-generic 3.11.10.5 > Tags: third-party-packages saucy > Uname: Linux 3.11.0-19-generic x86_64 > UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-29 (158 days ago) > UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1247259/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247259 Title: rhythmbox unresponsive every few seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1247259/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
