Isn't that the opposite of how Feature Freeze Exception requests go, that it should be more likely to be accepted if there are *not* many changes?
Yesterday, it was reported that Ubuntu will have GNOME 3.24. And the first thing a GNOME packager for another distro said was well it isn't really GNOME 3.24 if you don't have *all* of it. Now my first choice is that the MIR for PCRE2 be approved and I've been disappointed in how bug 1636666 has been handled so far. I got the impression I was being told to try to revert the PCRE2 stuff in vte/gnome-terminal (since trying to port everything in main to PCRE2 is an unreasonable request). So it would be frustrating after I do the work if the answer is both No to the MIR and No to doing the update with the reverts. I believe the reverts are safe for zesty; my maintainability concerns are more about maybe a year from now when the code has drifted more. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666264 Title: FFe: Update gnome-terminal to 3.24 and vte to 0.48 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1666264/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
