** Description changed:

- https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/334
+ Upstream bug: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/334
+ Upstream fix: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/281
  
  ---
  
  Xorg sessions have higher output lag than Wayland sessions.
  
  Test case:
  Grab a window with the mouse and drag it around smoothly.
  
  Expected: the same minimal gap between the cursor and the window's title bar 
in both Xorg and Wayland sessions.
  Observed: a bigger gap (higher latency) in Xorg sessions.
  
  I only realized this was a bug when I stumbled on a fix while
  experimenting with the presentation timing logic in mutter, so assigning
  to myself.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: mutter 3.30.0-4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-8.9-generic 4.18.7
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-8-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu11
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sun Oct  7 17:22:48 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-05-26 (133 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Alpha amd64 (20180525)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
   LANG=en_AU.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: mutter
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues #334
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/334

** Also affects: fmutter via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/334
   Importance: Unknown
       Status: Unknown

** Project changed: fmutter => mutter

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796549

Title:
  Xorg sessions have higher output lag than Wayland sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1796549/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Reply via email to