> Do we need evince to be reuploaded for jammy there since the previous
upload was rejected by Steve?
I'm trying to see what type of error we get if we load a profile with
such a rule and the target profile does not exist:
/{,snap/core/[0-9]*/,snap/snapd/[0-9]*/}usr/bin/snap mrCx ->
snap_browsers,
Will it be worse than what we have now?
Will evince's postinst fail when it reloads the profile with the above line,
and snap_browsers is not defined?
Will it crash when a link in a pdf is clicked?
It's taking a bit to setup a jammy desktop vm to try this, and I have
other SRUs to process. Georgia, could you elaborate on what would happen
if the new evince were to be installed with an old apparmor that knows
nothing about the snap_browsers profile?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064
Title:
Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to open it if the default browser
is a snap
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1794064/+subscriptions
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
