<quote who="Andrew Johnson"> > For binary purposes I expect people to disable it from gtk-engines and > depend on smooth packages based on official smooth releases, with official > smooth version numbers. > > For all practical packaging purposes you should pretend it isn't even > there.
So what's stopping us from a) disabling these engines by default and b) just flat out removing them from the tarball entirely? Why pretend? ;-) > I am quite sure I even said or implied this in the gtk-engines > README. Maybe I simply need to clarify the README more.. > And then perhaps rename the file to > UNDER_NO_CIRCUMSTANCES_SHOULD_YOU_READ_THIS so it actually has a chance of > being read. ;) The README doesn't really even come close to saying anything like this (at least in the 2.6.0 tarball release). - Jeff -- GUADEC 2005: Stuttgart, Germany http://2005.guadec.org/ He's not an idiot. The doctor said so. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
