On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:49:59 -0500, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:43:43 +0100, Paolo Borelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > read http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110191 and in particular > > the comment #20. We have (almost) the code, but we are not confortable > > with the testing: it will go in as soon as 2.11 is branched so to get > > tested for a whole developement cycle. > > > > And no, it obviously isn't a show stopper nor a regression. > > Yeah, absolutely not. It would be great for someone to do an audit of > this kind of thing and have it as a focus for 2.12, but it totally > isn't a showstopper.
(On a non-release-team-y note, if this is so hard to do, does that indicate something is deeply fucked in our APIs?) Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
