Hi, Luis Villa wrote: > Yeah, absolutely not. It would be great for someone to do an audit of > this kind of thing and have it as a focus for 2.12, but it totally > isn't a showstopper.
I wonder how best to group these things together so that people don't forget about them after a release - often you see comments "next release cycle, we will audit X" (sometimes it's even "this release cycle"). Among things I have seen that fit into this category is performance. It would be really cool if every maintainer made performance a headline, measurable goal for 2.12 (reduce total memory footprint of GNOME by 10%, improve startup speed by 10%?) I don't know what decent metrics might be, but they should be measurable and attainable goals. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CV: http://dneary.free.fr/CV/ T�l: 04 72 33 95 35 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
