Frederic Crozat wrote:

Le lundi 28 f�vrier 2005 � 22:57 +0100, Kjartan Maraas a �crit :


There is one bugreport with patches that I think should be looked at
before 2.10:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137864

It would be very nice if we could ship with the patches in here included
as well. I got the impression Mandrake has already been using these.



FYI, these patches has been integrated in Mdk vte package for Mdk 10.1
(out for almost 6 months now) and I did get any bug report caused by
them.



Has anyone been testing the vte accessibility with these patches? I would have some concerns there, as we (Sun) are not using these patches at the moment.


However, we *are* using patches for the following bugs, which we consider vital for accessibility:

153405 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153405> cri Urg [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW Terminal crashes often while working with gnopernicus







113590 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113590> maj Hig [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW vte and AtkText selection


        
        
        
        
        
        







132316 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132316> nor Hig [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW terminal widget's context menu posting isn't exposed as a...
138653 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138653> nor Hig [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW crash opening/closing multiple gnome-terminal tabs








156161 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156161> nor Nor [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNCO AccessibleText_getTextAtOffset returns wrong values in g...


        
        
        
        
        
        



In particular the patches for 153405, 138653, and 156161 fix several crasher scenarios. Bug 113590 prevents the implementation of a key ATK interface.

I consider vte to be unmaintained.

- Bill

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to