On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 10:01 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: >>http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-themes/gtk-themes/Simple/gtkrc?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 >> >>It was a patch from Eugenia that I applied six months ago, that I said >>I'd revert if people complained. > >AAARGH... >That's why my change was never visible on my updates of the gnome-themes >package! Because you placed the code I sent you on the wrong theme so I >never had a chance to see it! I sent you the patch for the "Default" theme >(aka Raleigh in the Red Hat world), not for the "Simple" theme! > >I can understand where the confusion started (having a theme called >"Default" and yet not being the default theme of Gnome), but you could have >reply to me to my email I sent you some months ago asking for the status of >the change. I was clear that the change is for the "Default/Raleigh" theme, >I even sent you a screenshot of it, I really don't know how it ended up on >Simple. > >Anyways, could you please remove the change from the Simple theme (which >was not meant for) and place it on the "Default" theme instead?
I don't understand. How exactly did you send a "patch" that Calum was able to apply it to the wrong file? When people send me patches, I patch -p0 < some-patch.diff I mean, how does this go wrong? You create a patch with cvs diff -u > some-patch.diff Did you send a patch, or did you send a code snippet that Calum had to merge in manually? Bad things happen when we don't use our tools properly. -- Shaun _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
