<quote who="Alan Cox"> > There is huge pressure to create vendor-brand but the foundation trademark > fiasco caused most of what you are complaining about.
Sorry, but that's a massive overstatement. The trademark issues are unclear, but there are plenty of GNOME logos in the distros. If this was more about trademark than branding, it would've been sorted out under great pressure a long time ago. Yes, I totally agree that the trademark situation is unfortunate (you may be overstating it in particular because you were wildly unhappy with one of the DRAFT trademark agreements that no one else liked anyway), but let's not go over the top about it. - Jeff -- gnome.conf.au 2005: April 19th http://live.gnome.org/Canberra2005 "I allege that SCO is full of it, and that the Linux process is already the most transparent process in the whole industry." - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
