On Thu, 2005-17-03 at 08:54 +0530, Toufeeq Hussain wrote: > Hi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Elijah Newren > > > DEAR SIR OR MADAM, > > > > I WRITE YOU IN ABSOLUTE CONFIDENCE THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO RECEIVE 654 > > (SIX HUNDRED FIFTY-FOUR) PATCHES NOT MARKED AS REVIEWED THAT HAVE > > ACCUMULATED ON BUGZILLA SINCE THE RELEASE OF GNOME 2.8... > > > > Maybe I should quit this spam imitation or it won't get past peoples' > > filters. :-) We have made a number of changes[1] to try to make it > > easier to review patches for everyone, which will hopefully make it so > > that we can get more than 80% of patches reviewed[2]. These changes > > are: > > LOL! > I alomost clicked on delete, then saw "Elijah Newren" as the Sender's name > and thought > "ummm... that cannot be right!". > > -th
Hello Toufeeq, recently members of d-d-l have been working hard on trying to keep d-d-l high level and low noise. I think we all found Elijah's mail funny, but I think the subscribers might appreciate not having too many "me too" mails. Although it could just be my opinion. :) I wanted to point you to some sample rules for d-d-l I've been working on: live.gnome.org/Communication Cheers, Ryan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
