On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:21 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> The culprit is pretty obviously GConf which is why I'm glad DConf is
> considering having a DB backend to address this. The short term fixes
> which Havoc has already suggested (moving the schema crap sideways and
> possibly mmap'ing some things) should cut some of that down but only a
> properly indexed database will give you both speed and memory efficiency
> (mmap'ing stuff is obviously wasteful memory wise).
As GConf supports pluggable backends now, I wouldn't be surprised if a
prototype database backend could be hacked up in a day.
Why wait for DConf (assuming it actually fixes the other problems and
doesn't end up being another system which has no advantage over the DBus
port of GConf) when GConf has the framework needed now?
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
