I guess a fair compromise would be to aim for using gtk 2.8 for 2.12, but not using any new functionality in gtk 2.8. That way if it turns out 2.8 is not stable enough we can roll back to 2.6 before release. On the other side it is stable enough then we ensure its gets widely distributed and tested so we can start taking advantage of it for 2.14.
Christian On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:42 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:09 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > So, yeah, I'm pretty strongly against this, though I'm open to persuasion. > > <aol>Me too</aol>, for all the reasons Luis listed. I remember our r-t > discussions basically concluded that we'd made a mistake depending on > GTK+ for 2.6. 2.6 had stability issues. > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
