On 6/9/05, Jon K Hellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:39 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > If we're talking about performance/stability in the context of whether > > GNOME 2.12 should use GTK+ 2.8, we're effectively saying "I think the > > GTK+ team might ship a unstable or unacceptably slow 2.8.0 release; > > GNOME shouldn't commit to using GTK+ 2.8 yet". I would hope that we > > would have more confidence in the judgement of the GTK+ team than that. > > Crashes and performance are very different types of problem. Crashes get > fixed once they can be reproduced. Fixing bad performance can take a > long time. > > Well, I haven't tested gtk2.7 since just after Cairo got added, so I > can't tell whether there is a performance problem. Has anybody got > numbers?
I haven't seen this announced on gtk-devel or here, so: http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/ Apparently this is a test tool to test gtk performance. Would be great to have someone test 2.7 with it. Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
