On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:40 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > On 6/10/05, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I haven't seen this announced on gtk-devel or here, so: > > > > > > > > http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > > > > Apparently this is a test tool to test gtk performance. Would be great > > > > to have someone test 2.7 with it. > > > > > > Went ahead and did it myself. TextView is brutally slower (300-400%), > > > some other things are 25-30% slower, and some things actually get > > > faster. Disclaimer: I'm pretty sure I did this right and I'm linking > > > against the right stuff, but these numbers should be confirmed by an > > > expert, and I can't speak to the validity of the tool's measurements > > > itself, except to note that scrolling in a textview area is *visibly* > > > slower. > > > > New third column is HEAD + glitz, with an x31's ATI card. > > Someone larted me on IRC and informed me that it is likely that glitz > wasn't actually being used. So take these with an even bigger grain of > salt than my last set. I would love to know how one can (1) know for > certain glitz is being used and/or (2) how to force glitz to be used > so that I can do a quickie hack to automate this.
> > Total time: 253.31 565.94 647.60 The question is: Why did you get different times then? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] He's a fiendish umbrella-wielding househusband from the 'hood. She's a cold-hearted gypsy mechanic with the soul of a mighty warrior. They fight crime! _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list