On 6/10/05, John (J5) Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > [Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on > > this :) > > > > On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton said: > > > > I think the release team need to make a statement about what version of > > > > DBus is to be used for any code which can use DBus. At present I > > > > believe gnome-vfs and HAL in CVS are using the DBus 0.3x API, whereas > > > > nautilus-cd-burn is still using 0.2x. As these cannot be easily used at > > > > the same time, this needs to be resolved one way or another. > > > > > > Good point. I think that the distributors that will ship 2.12 will use > > > DBus 0.3x. Going with the DBus 0.3x API looks like the more sensible > > > solution to me. Is there any reason to stay with the 0.2x API? > > > > Yeah, I don't know of any reason not to standardize on 0.3x- most > > things have already ported AFAICS. d-d-l, anyone object to requiring > > everyone to move to 0.3x? (I'm assuming no, but...) > > I have patches for all core GNOME modules and if they aren't already in > CVS it means they were just not applied yet.
Are they in bugzilla? :) > If anyone else needs help > porting their stuff just let me know. I need to make a new DBus release > pretty soon. I will do so before I go to Germany next week. OK, that settles that. 0.3x it is. Luis (executively deciding ;) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list