Hi Bastien > I think most people agree that gnome-common isn't something that should > be packaged (at least that's true for Fedora/Red Hat distros), as gnome- > common is a development tool, to build from CVS. I think it should be > removed altogether from the FTP site, so as not to create confusion. I would not agree. For people like me who actually deal with a couple of CVS modules it would be handy to have gnome-common packaged (I am trying to manage everything as RPMs - unless I develop it myself which is not the case for gnome-common).
> If somebody is going to compile a program from CVS, they might as well > check out gnome-common at the same time. Sure. Same about the rest of the gnome:) I'd say the fact that gnome-common is useful for gnome developers only does not adjust the idea to keep it non-packaged and non-released. Regards, Sergey _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
