On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 18:06 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 23:50 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:33 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:14 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > > > Hey, guys- if I wanted to test this: > > > > (1) what would I need to do to set it up, exactly? (presume that I > > > > have all of GNOME running from source, and can patch as needed.) > > > > > > You just need to patch gnome-session with Rodrigo's latest patch > > > (turning it on with whatever the compile switch is - Rodrigo?) > > > > > --enable-services > > > > Also, it would be great if you could test --disable-services to come > > back to the old gnome-session, and see if the patch breaks anything. > > > > > and > > > compile libgnomeservice from CVS. > > > > > and apply the patches (*.patch) that are in libgnomeservice CVS. That > > will make some services (nautilus, gnome-volume-manager, metacity, > > panel) use the new infrastructure. > > I'm not so concerned about this stuff right this second. We are pushing > the drop in service file wrapper stuff for 2.12 so that is where I would > spend my testing energies. > > The service framework itself will need massive hammering on before I > feel we can even propose it but that is the next stage of our dastardly > plan. > > If we can get things running where session runs fine with the new code > and service startup using the wrapper runs great then at that point we > can start messing with framework itself, replacing things service by > service until we have everything running under the framework. > ok, here are some instructions for people willing to test it:
http://blogs.gnome.org/view/rodrigo/2005/07/11/0 -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
