On 7/14/05, Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:04 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > > Also, Colin, does eggcups still depend on a patched cupsd? I'm not > > sure if that should matter, but seems like it is relevant for testing, > > etc. > > Thinking about this a bit on the drive in, I realized what you were > probably driving at is the impact of having eggcups running without a > patched cupsd. > > What will happen with the existing code right now is the user never sees > the icon and it just takes up a small amount of memory. I could pretty > trivially change that so it removes itself from the session and exits. > Thus GNOME users on non-patched cups systems would get a negligible > check on first login and never thereafter. > > Does that answer the question?
You got it right the first time :) In theory, being part of GNOME (among other things) means that the QA team has tested a component, and it'll be very hard to do that if the requirement is to rebuild cups as well :/ That said, you guys (RH) have been shipping eggcups for a while with no serious issues, right? Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
