<quote who="Daniel Borgmann"> > One alternative would be that you just call it Clearlooks and we change > the Clearlooks default to be what you have in mind (at least for the > metatheme, which is GNOME specific anyway). Another one would be to call > it Default or maybe GNOME Default. In any case I think the comment should > be changed to reflect that it's the default (and I agree with Luca that > the current one is rather silly, even though it was my idea :P).
I'd suggest removing every reference to 'default' in all of the theme names and comments. Makes life much easier. ;-) > Finally, are you planning to use a current snapshot of the Clearlooks > engine? AFAIK the current snapshot in gtk-engines is somewhat dated > and there are a lot of refinements in the latest release. I don't > know how much those details matter for screenshots. ... why don't we just ship the clearlooks tarballs, given that's what you guys are working on? Not a lot of point keeping the same thing in two spots; that always seems to wind up badly. :-) - Jeff -- GNOME Summit 2005: October 8th-10th http://live.gnome.org/Boston2005 "Life is short. Forgive quickly. Kiss slowly." - Robert Doisneau _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
