On 7/18/05, Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 09:05 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > [I'm not opposed to 2.7 going in anymore- what bugs there are seem to > > be getting fixed very promptly- so this is just for information.] > > > > On 7/18/05, Mark McLoughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 14:01 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, we GNOME 2.12 is planned to use GTK+ 2.8. There's always a slight > > > > > chance that we would try to revert to 2.6 is something went terribly > > > > > wrong, but things seem to be OK so far. > > > > > > > > It seems, from a vendor point of view (I'm not a vendor), that we need > > > > to make a real statement, without the "there is a slight chance that > > > > we'll revert to 2.6". Else, nobody will use GTK+ 2.8. > > > > > > Fedora has had GTK+ 2.7 for nearly a month now. I'm not aware any > > > major > > > issues with it currently ... Matthias would know better, though. > > > > For the record, because fedora/rh basically actively discourage people > > from using rawhide (though this is less true than it used to be), > > 'rawhide does $FOO' is not particularly persuasive to the QA team > > I wasn't addressing any concerns of the QA team - I was addressing the > concerns of other vendors. Fedora has committed to GTK+ 2.8 in its next > release - that should be a modicum of comfort for other vendors. > > (To counter your point, though - Fedora's rawhide testing community > isn't insignificant)
The number of upstream bugs they file against GNOME is basically insignificant- in the teens per month, on average. Perhaps that is something that is not actively encouraged? If there is a significant community there, I'd like to get them more involved in GNOME bug work. Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
