On 7/18/05, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/18/05, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > P.S. It was suggested that I should 'make distcheck' in tinderbox. > > > > Opinions? > > Luis is cool for doing all this tinderbox work.
Heh. Thank James mostly; he wrote the code and I'm just whining obsessively. > > Sane? Insane? > > Does it matter? I think it'd be useful, though I'm betting libwnck > fails and I'll be unable to fix it (I wasn't able to last time I > tried, but thankfully people smarter than I are handling the > releases...) Let me ask the question in a more detailed fashion: * would it be useful? It was suggested to me that it would make snapshotting easier (since things would be basically guaranteed to build in a packagable fashion), but are there reasons past that? * would it be feasible? I'm not going to test something if it is (1) likely to be broken 90% of the time and (2) james and thomas are the only people with enough skills to fix the problems. Nor does forcing all maintainers to learn more auto* seem like a reasonable use of anyone's time. Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list