On 7/18/05, Danilo Šegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today at 18:56, Elijah Newren wrote: > > > > Sane? Insane? > > > Does it matter? I think it'd be useful, though I'm betting libwnck > > fails and I'll be unable to fix it (I wasn't able to last time I > > tried, but thankfully people smarter than I are handling the > > releases...) > > I managed once to build entire Gnome during 2.7 using jhbuild (with > features jamesh just introduced back then to build outside of your > checkout directory, basically mimicking what distcheck is doing, > without the "make check" part :), and I remember having only to fix a > few Makefile.am's to use $(top_srcdir) and $(top_builddir) where > appropriate. And yeah, some gtk-doc stuff was causing big problems > for me, but I can't remember if I resolved that or I just disabled it > at the time. :( > > So, I think it should be doable, and more than useful!
Well, ATM, using a simple-but-possibly-wrong hack[1] 10 of the 18 gtk dependencies fail distcheck. So... obviously I could be doing something wrong (some of the failures seem to indicate 'new' dependencies, for example) but it's clearly not going to be a walk in the park for this to work. Luis [1] replace 'make check' with 'make distcheck' in the make check (i.e., post-build, pre-install) phase
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
