On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 17:20 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote: > There could or could not be significant issues in 2.7. The point is its > not certain and it introduces significant *risk* to the schedule. We > went through the same thing with 2.6 and it seems we learned nothing, > see your own original view: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-June/msg00020.html > > As well as Andrew's: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-June/msg00022.html
Just for reference, the main differences between 2.6 and 2.8 are their stability and completeness *at this point* in the release cycle - ie. the point at which we are committing to one. 2.8 appears to be more stable and complete than 2.6 was. -- Andrew _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
