On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 19:11 +0200, Richard Stellingwerff wrote: > On 7/22/05, Steven Garrity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Shaun McCance wrote: > > > 3) My theme is like the default Clearlooks theme, but it has a > > > more vibrant selection color. Most people seem to like that > > > modification. It makes things look less washed out, without > > > being obnoxiously bright. I was actually originally pushing > > > the DeepSky variant, but more recent Clearlooks seem to have > > > made it use brighter background colors. If we just depend on > > > Clearlooks, we have to decide what to do with this. > > > > I think this more vibrant color could probably be adopted as the default > > by the clearlooks developer. I'd suggest going that way anyhow (sound > > ok, Remenic?) > > Yes, this sounds good to me. I just have one little question for > Shaun. ClearlooksBlue does not have the inset look on buttons, was > this on purpose? > > If you're not sure what the difference is, see > http://www.stellingwerff.com/blue1.png (normal) vs > http://www.stellingwerff.com/blue2.png (inset). The difference is very > minimal, but I do feel that the inset adds something.
I don't recall changing that. I just took the Clearlooks gtkrc file and modified the selection color. If people want the inset turned on, then we can turn it on. -- Shaun _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
