[snip] > And we've never competently reviewed patches, much less > capably kept an eye on cvs-commits.
We review patches at hard-code freeze. It gets done. It isn't sane to introduce a huge > new responsibility, which (1) would require reading *every commit* to > CVS-commits *all year round* and That would be mad, and it's not what I'm proposing. People would have to police themselves. They do it already for the freezes, and the existing API/ABI rules. We very rarely have to tell somebody that they are doing something wrong. > (2) which the current platform > totally fails at, I disagree. I proposed formalising this because I think we are ready for it. > indicating that there isn't much consensus or > support for it. Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
