> On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 21:08 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote: > > It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really > > useful. Pretty please? :) > > Useful for what? ;-) ... all the "doing work" kind of discussions seem > to be adequately handled by bugzilla. And I can certainly imagine a lot > of annoying discussions likely to appear on metacity-list that would not > count as "doing work"
For discussing long-standing issues with Metacity. Like the focus-stealing problems, the placement algorithm or the (ugh!) minimize animation. :) And for asking things like how do you implement X in Metacity or like "I'd like to implement this awesome feature, do you think it would be a good idea or not?" It doesn't feel right to open bugzilla bugs for those kinds of things. Plus, it is easy to find old discussions by search mailing-list archives. Not so easy with bugzilla. > If there are topics that really need a list, they are on topic for > desktop-devel-list, usability list, and other gnome lists. I don't think > we need a metacity list until the metacity-specific content becomes a > significant amount of traffic on the main gnome lists, no? Yes.. But some people migth be afraid to pollute the big desktop-devel-list with issues that doesn't concern most of its readers. :) -- mvh Björn _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
