Rodrigo Moya wrote: >I've just sent a patch >(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnomecc-list/2005-October/msg00024.html) >for using -nocpp where possible. > > Given the problems mentioned before with parsing Xresources without a cpp, is this actually worth it?
>From previous messages, I was under the impression that the main slowdown came from paging gcc into memory. Changing some, but not all, invocations to not run the C preprocessor wouldn't affect that. A patch to change all xrdb invocations to "xrdb -cpp /path/to/a/small/cpp" would probably provide better results without the compatibility problems. James. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
