On 12/5/05, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/5/05, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > man, 05,.12.2005 kl. 18.51 -0500, skrev Luis Villa: > > > On 12/5/05, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This is a reminder to fix all critical warnings before January 1st. On > > > > that day, users of gnome-session HEAD will get G_DEBUG=fatal_criticals > > > > turned on automatically. > > > > > > > > Let's find those bugs and kill them! > > > > > > link to bugzilla query? > > > > > Did we agree on a keyword or some whiteboard magic? > > No, partially because I'm not sure if we need one. > > > > > I've marked some "critical-warning" (whiteboard) now, but I guess the > > easiest way is to just search for "-CRITICAL" in comments. This gave 231 > > hits for me. > > Most of which were due to uses of phrases like "non-critical" (e.g. > Owen used that phrase in some of the mass-bug-change thingys). A > better search would be G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL, which appears in the > stack traces. Would that be good enough, or are there bugs filed > about critical warnings that come without stack traces or that are > missing this word? > > If we can use that, and we can use the fulltext search in > bugzilla-newer (which is waaay faster than searching comments in > current bugzilla), then this'll be fairly quick. I only get 6 bugs > with such a query. Unfortunately, giving you the url right now > wouldn't help a whole lot since (a) it will change soon as > bugzilla-newer is under construction, and (b) bugzilla-newer only has > an old snapshot of the database anyway. Can you wait a couple weeks > for the link to the bugzilla query?
I can, but then again, I'm not the one who is supposed to be fixing things by Jan. 1st :) Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
