<quote who="Emmanuele Bassi"> > I, for one, did not understand why Breezy did ship with that crippled > "ubuntu-nautilus" option set to "on" by default inside the schema, that > closed the parent windows behind, breaking my work flow without letting me > know (apart from digging into Ubuntu's bugzilla and the changelog for the > nautilus package) what the hell happenend. *This*, for me, was a major > flaw for Breezy; a flaw that reflected onto GNOME itself.
Yep. That was certainly a bummer for everyone involved. > Ubuntu, as a packager, has all the rights of changing the default > settings; on the other hand, I don't think that upstream behaviour should > change, unless *every* GNOME packager decides to ship with browser mode by > default - and even then, I'd be still strongly against it. GNOME, as a project, has always understood and supported the reality that our distributors can and will make changes. I don't want to see us become the kind of project that whines and moans about the way distributors take advantage of the rights we give them under our chosen license. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2006: Dunedin, New Zealand http://linux.conf.au/ "World domination is a community responsibility." - Michael Hall, LinuxPlanet _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
