Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2006, 11:11 +0100 schrieb Jordi Mallach: > In most cases, policies were established before the voices against the > license got strong, but I suspect that the strongest reason is that > "if > the FSF recommends this one for docs, it must be The Right Thing". > > Well, we don't think it is ;)
What are the precise problem with GDFL-licensed documents, when there are no invariant sections? We can have a policy to accept any GDFL-licensed document if it doesn't contain any invariant section. Debian could have done so as well, but they decided to distinguish themselves as unpragmatic nerds. -- Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
