Hi, On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:30 -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> > Murray's email, it's not suitable for that set either. So we need to > > determine what we want to do and reach consensus on this point as > > well. A variety of options exist: > > I'll bring a conservative point of view forward: binding inclusion > aside, does this make gedit any faster? Gedit is a lot faster in 2.13 than 2.12. Have you tried it recently? > Does it make it slower? Slower > is not acceptable, as gedit has been feeling slower and slower every > release. > > Maybe it's time for a gedit-lite that bears much more resemblance to > Windows notepad than where gedit is going. Notepad is a poor excuse for a text *viewer*, with inane limitations that have survived the ages. Even on win32 I use wordpad instead of notepad. I wouldn't use it in a comparison with any software - even with cat or emacs - as a form of respect for the other program. Ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Log: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
