> > They could use basic triaging in the sense that someone should go > > through them and see what applies to the 0.10 version. I think that > > you'd find most GStreamer bug triagers to mark them as obsolete if they > > apply only to the 0.8 backend though, and I don't know if that's what > > you want in this case. > > I don't think marking them as obsolete is okay right now. I'd use the > status whiteboard so we can easily know they're only happening with the > 0.8 backend. (Or maybe create a gstreamer0.8 component, but this is > ugly).
I'd find it useful if the short bug descriptions were prefixed with a [0.8] or [0.10] to indicate which backend they apply to (if Bastien doesn't object on aesthetical grounds). Cheers -Tim _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list