On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 09:11 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > I think crippling functionality because Hal hasn't been ported to some > OSs yet is unreasonable. The alternative would be to provide a myriad of > small daemons that need to be individually ported, and that time could > be better spent on providing hal and giving us some consistency between > hardware access on different platforms.
I'm not talking about crippling functionality; or saying that people can't use it. I'm saying let's not commit to it in Desktop at this point. Is there absolutely any reason it *must* be in Desktop? Should we include NetworkManager is Desktop also? --d -- Davyd Madeley http://www.davyd.id.au/ 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
