On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 01:21:36PM +0800, James Henstridge wrote: > >If we are talking about making g-i-t part of the platform, it should > >also be pointed out > >that the latest releases of g-i-t have added "animations" in the form of > >"stuff-all-frames-in-a-png". While I think that adding support for > >animations in icon themes > >might be valuable, I think > > > >a) this needs to be discussed as an addition to the icon theme spec on > >[EMAIL PROTECTED], which I have not seen happening so far > > > >b) I believe we should pick a file format that did not already look > >antiquated when it was first employed in wanda the fish 5 years ago. > >Even gif animations look modern and featureful compared to this. > > > > > It is also worth noting that if we do use animation strips, it is > generally best to arrange the frames vertically. Since the image is > stored as scanlines, it means that each frame is stored as a contiguous > block of memory rather than being spread out over the pixbuf/pixmap.
What ever happened to APNG and MNG? Did they ever get figured out, did anyone ever implement them? --d -- Davyd Madeley http://www.davyd.id.au/ 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
