On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 23:31 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 01/13/2006 04:40 PM, Murray Cumming wrote: > > Yes, any spec would need to be supported by the major players. If GNOME > > and KDE follow it, there's no reason to think that Firefox and > > OpenOffice wouldn't. And Firefox uses GTK+ anyway, so they'd get a lot > > for free. > > Firefox aims for support with the least common denominator. That means > GTK+ 2.0. If its not in GTK+ 2.0.x, it is going to be a pain to get > supported. There is support for a very few amount of things, which are > done with dlsym() hacks.
But distros could enable these features as configure-time options, right? > Project Ridley and GTK+ 3.0.x is important for app vendors. Yet it sounds irrelevant to Mozilla, who are an app vendor. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
