On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Hi, > > Le jeudi 16 février 2006 à 09:47 -0500, William Jon McCann a écrit : > > + gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed, > > and more integration should be done. It won't go in for 2.14, but > > we'd like to see a good integration work starting soon for 2.16. > > > > I submit that unless such a decision points to specific feature, > > robustness, or integration bugs it lacks validity. Think of it this > > way: how is Richard supposed to know what to work on - or what if these > > can all be fixed within the day? This is one reason why we have the > > same discussions every release cycle. > > > > Let me address the primary concern that was given - lack of integration. > > It is precisely because gnome-power-manager is well integrated that we > > are now having a discussion about whether gnome-screensaver should be > > excluded from GNOME 2.14 simply because it is well integrated with > > gnome-power-manager. > > So, my personal concern about gnome-power-manager is lack of > integration. What does it mean? gnome-power-manager provides a nice > notification area icon. What is its relation to the battery status > applet? It makes no sense to have both. This is a (big) integration > issue, IMHO. > g-p-m, if included, should, IMO, replace the battstat applet. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
