On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 13:19 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 20:03 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 14:17 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote: > > > A policy request: > > > > > > It would be a good thing if all applications available from > > > f.g.o were required to support 'make uninstall' > > > > > > Most applications found on f.g.o do support 'make uninstall'. There are > > > some that do not. > > > > > > > > > Thoughts??? > > > > Another thing that should work: > > > > ./configure --disable-scrollkeeper should _REALLY_ mean don't run > > scrollkeeper-update, not just pretend to disable it and run it anyways > > because not all gtk-doc statements were wrecked out of the makefiles. > > The current state with gnome 2.14 is that we run sed over all > > Makefile.in files to wreck out the scrollkeeper-update statements, after > > we run ./configure with --disable-scrollkeeper. > > --disable-scrollkeeper is a gnome-doc-utils feature, and should > work for any module using gnome-doc-utils. If it's failing to > work in some situations with gnome-doc-utils, please file a bug.
The point with these modules is that they're converted from gtk-doc to gnome-doc-utils. Some modules didn't get rid of the gtk-doc things in the makefiles, so now a packager has to disable two things to avoid a scrollkeeper DB in $DESTDIR. I'll report bugs when I find one. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
