-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Completely agreed.  As someone who wrote one of the current
> goals, I was a bit scared by how the goal went live with review
> from only three people, and it could have been flawed seriously.
> In this case (AppIcons) it probably is not, but the PoLinguas
> raised the internal this-is-a-nasty-hack signal of me too.  It
> indeed works *for now*, but I too think that we should not spent
> this massive effort on things we know should change soon.

Behdad,

While we're on the topic of the AppIcon goal,  could you respond to the
question raised earlier today?

> Can I ask for a little bit of clarification on this goal?  Is this
> only supposed to apply to the application icon?  What about apps that
> provide different icons (toolbar icons, etc.)?  Are these expected to
> still be installed to $datadir/pixmaps?  or should they follow the
> same pattern described for app icons?

> Jonner

Thanks,

Adam Schreiber
- --
Why isn't all of your email protected?
http://gnupg.org
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
http://seahorse.sourceforge.net
http://live.gnome.org/Seahorse
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3rc2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEOvOsjU1oaHEI4wgRAlNTAKCd4SbeSiHWY09GLCOJS7/DmSe0yACgvIS1
ibOUnq/sfS/CEObE3kO3WIo=
=UT4q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to