<quote who="Elijah Newren"> > On 4/20/06, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It introduces a problem with the odd minor number semantics, but that > > might be solvable [1]. > > I was thinking ftp servers still said 2.16.x, 2.17.x, etc., it's just that > all public correspondence about it and even mailing list messages and such > would all it "16", "17" and so on. Thus, there is no real change. "Gnome > 16" -> stable. "Gnome 17" -> unstable.
Right, but public correspondence about "GNOME 17 [1] (please don't get too excited it's a development release)" is going to be more confusing than the current fairly well-understood Linux-kernel style numbering. - Jeff [1] I'm going to beat up on you until you start writing 'GNOME' correctly! -- Desktop Linux Summit 2006 http://www.desktoplinuxsummit.org/ "I allege that SCO is full of it, and that the Linux process is already the most transparent process in the whole industry." - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
