On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 23:00 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > There are other languages bindings > > > in our release set, but none of them have been similarly blessed. > > > Assuming Gtk# is added to the bindings set, should it be a language > > > core apps can use? > > > > That's an interesting question - put another way, should the desktop > > depend on the bindings? I certainly wouldn't have a problem with that - > > although making GNOME depend on Mono is an issue which would give me > > more pause than making it depend on gtkmm. > > The desktop already depends on the bindings since we have some python > love in the desktop :-) The question is, do we accept all languages in > the desktop, or just a small selection of what's available in the > bindings (and which selection?). > I think we should allow everything written with a blessed binding, provided that code is optional (like nautilus+beagle integration, for instance), so that we don't force 3rd parties to use them if they don't want to. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
