Two words... Hell yeah. (4 if you count the intro...15 if you count this bit)
On 4/21/06, Sriram Ramkrishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I'm seeing that everybody is up for Tomboy as part of the desktop. > Yes? > > sri > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 01:03:38PM -0700, Alex Graveley wrote: > > > > Ya, that makes sense to me. I'd like to move towards a pluggable > > storage backend approach anyway, to support network storage or shared > > notes, so an e-d-s backend could be an option as well. > > > > It seems like this issue shouldn't block Tomboy's inclusion though, > > given that e.g. stickynotes doesn't store in e-d-s either, and I've not > > received any requests for tomboy/e-d-s storage. A future goal to unify > > storage sounds good to me, once people start using Tomboy and Evolution > > notes both. > > > > -Alex > > > > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > >On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 12:10 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote: > > >>Two questions: > > >>1) Can you explain the actual user-benefit to keeping Tomboy notes in > > >>e-d-s? > > >> > > >the user can use whatever frontend, but the notes will be the same in > > >all applications. Isn't that a benefit? No need to export/import/look > > >for weird .dotdirs where the files were saved last time a specific > > >frontend worked, etc, etc > > > > > >>2) Is moving Tomboy to use e-d-s going to be a requirement for inclusion > > >>in Gnome? > > >> > > >I don't think so, but it would be a good thing > > _______________________________________________ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > -- > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
