GARNOME has been "successfully" built on a number of older systems.
We do make in clear in the README that some features will not work without a 2.6.x kernel. -Joseph ========================================================================= On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 09:22 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 4/22/06, Mark Rosenstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 00:28 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote: > > > This situation is slightly different in that we're replacing > > > functionality; my reaction would be that the small number of users still > > > using 2.4 kernels can install battstat (hell, they've got it installed > > > already; they just need to remember not to randomly delete it!). > > > > People usually use a package manager and upgrade their packages. A step > > in this process is to remove the old files. > > Are you aware of anyone packaging Gnome for any distro that uses > linux-2.4.x? I'm not, and thus don't see the point in 2.4 kernels > holding back our decision for new features/modules (especially since, > as Andrew points out, the relevant users can use older > deprecated/removed modules). > > My $0.02 anyway... > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- joseph_sacco [at] comcast [dot] net _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
