On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:50:18AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/29/06, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Le lundi 29 mai 2006 à 08:11 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > > >> Awesome, assuming no one has any reason against it, thanks for making > >> things more sane. Would it also be okay if I changed the bugzilla > >> module name for you (from control-center to gnome-control-center) so > >> that all three match? > > > >Would be nice but I thought than changing the bugzilla componant was an > >issue for bug-buddy by example (that was bkor said on IRC when > >system-monitor was renamed to gnome-system-monitor) > > Maybe that's just because the bugzilla module name wasn't also > updated, meaning that an inconsistency was maintained? (Currently, > that only affects the cvs link; bkor intends to add other integration > features which would require consistency in the module naming.) > Personally, I think the system-monitor bugzilla module should be > renamed to gnome-system-monitor too. Anyone object to that?
.desktop files can specify the bugzilla product & component which bug-buddy must use. Bug-buddy will give confusing error messages if that product/component cannot be found (these are specified in XML files). We could add a hack to pretend control-center still exists (together with gnome-control-center). Then we must also fix the script that actually reads the bug-buddy email. > We'll probably have to get bkor (or fer) to chime in to be certain as > I don't know as many details about the bug-buddy stuff, but I'd be > really surprised if renaming bugzilla components caused bug-buddy > problems -- that's exactly why I thought bug-buddy does that frequent > annoying update stuff downloading > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/bugzilla.gnome.org/bugzilla-products.xml and > a few other files in that directory. (A quick sidenote: this Those are actually only used to check if the .desktop stuff is ok and for versions etc. Also it allows bug-buddy to show a list of products on Bugzilla. > annoyance is something that will soon be fixed, along with many other > issues, by the awesome XML-RPC work bkor has been doing). For XMl-RPC Fer made it that if the .desktop file doesn't specify a product/component, bug-buddy will not even try to submit the stacktrace (perhaps it will automatically save it -- not sure). If product and component are specified it should pass them on without checking. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
