So there's been no comment on this (or I must have missed it). Are we considering Orca for GNOME 2.16[1]?
sri [1] I'm assuming this is the time to propose new modules. Although it seems kind of early to me. On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:21 -0400, Willie Walker wrote: > Hi All: > > We (the Orca team) have been very busy the past few weeks and would like > to provide more status of where we are with respect to the proposal to > include Orca in GNOME 2.16. I believe we have implemented the missing > features in Orca that are present in Gnopernicus, and we've also done a > fair amount of stability and testing work. > > We've also broached the subject of including Orca in GNOME 2.16 on > [EMAIL PROTECTED] The discussion thread can be found here: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg00002.html > > We've received positive feedback thus far (public and private), > including the following message from Baum, the maintainer of > Gnopernicus: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg00004.html > > as well as the following from the Ubuntu accessibility team: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg00012.html > > I believe we are on track here, and we are definitely committed to the > effort. With the exception of carrying on a discussion on > [email protected], the proposal/acceptance process is still a > mystery to me. I'd like to make sure we are not missing something > really big here, and I'm curious about what other barriers to adoption > may exist for getting Orca into GNOME 2.16. We will work hard to > address the issues that arise. > > Thanks! > > Will > (Orca project lead) > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- Sri Ramkrishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
