On 6/18/06, Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This sounds like a very good idea. But could you give more details? > What does the --include option accept? A string, file name, ...? I > rather pass information through a pipe, really, anything else is bound > to reach either a cmdline length limit, or force you to create a > temporary file (if done wrong we'll be seeing those security fixes due > to bad tmpfile handling in a few months).
--include points to a filename including the trace. You have also a --kill <pid> command (not working yet) to get your application killed by bug-buddy after the bug report. I guess that getting a trace in python on mono is not as expensive as the gdb thing, so there would not be a big delay after the crash and the bug-buddy interface coming up. But if we have a big delay we could use instead a named pipe to feed the trace over it, so the bindings can call bug-buddy inmidiately and then getting/feeding the trace while bug-buddy shows the progress bar. Salu2 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
