Remus - I think there's still time to fix 2.1.X gnopernicus with a new release if you happen to have a chance to do it today (before the cvs to subversion migration).
regards, Bill > Remus wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 14:56 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > > + gnopernicus needs a new release. Or we'll release with 1.0.4. > > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341942 > > > > > > > Last gnopernicus versions are 1.0.6 for gnome-2-14 branch and > 1.1.0 for > > > head. > > > > Unfortunately, gnopernicus 1.1.0 doesn't build -- see the bug. So > GNOME > > 2.15.4 will use 1.0.6. > > > > > When I checked, I saw that on head same issue is fixed. I didn't > realize > it was after 1.1.0 tarball release. > > Regards, > Remus > > > > ------------------------- _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
