Jason D. Clinton <me <at> jasonclinton.com> writes: > Just an observation: I have spent a great deal of time in the last 4 > years hanging out on both GNOME and KDE's IRC channels and reading both > Planets (once they existed). C++ is no silver bullet. In fact, KDE > developers frequently complain about issues in C++ implementations (g++ > stability) and design problems (templates come to mind).
I do C++ for a living (in Qt if you mind, but this does not matter). Programming in C++ does not mean using all the C++ features. Far from it. Projects like AbiWord and Mozilla have restricted the use of some C++ obscure features. This is called discipline. This was the subject of the talk I proposed for Guadec [1]. And yes C++ brings its own set of problems too. > I think C and C++ both fall in to the same "GCC-supported" languages > bucket (as a matter of classification for the purposes of this > argument). I think that definitely C++ brings things that C does not provide, and stay in the category of "no VM". Please note that, unlike some people told me *privately*[2], I'm not advocating the all C++, but rather the "have a look at C++ it solve some of your problems are having with C for application development". And for the argument "C++ is not taught in university, etc"[2] let me re-affirm that developping applications requires learning, and learning non trivial things. Like in each and every case. And FWIW, C++ is still an industry standard in the field of software development. Hub [1] I had to cancel my presence there. [2] you know who you are. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
