On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 17:30 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le lundi 17 juillet 2006, à 10:12, JP Rosevear a écrit : > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:58 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 08:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > And while there were almost no objections to Python, there are clearly > > > > many objections to Mono. > > > > > > I used to have objections against the python bindings, but after those > > > got splitup in pygtk, gnome-python, gnome-python-desktop and > > > gnome-python-extras, I don't have big problems with it. > > > > > > Looking at mono, all of these bindings are in one package: gtk-sharp-2. > > > I think, to get mono as accepted binding language, we should have a > > > splitup similiar to the splitup that has been done to the python > > > bindings. > > > > This is really just a packaging issue, on opensuse/SLED they are all > > individual packages (glib-sharp, gtk-sharp, etc). > > How do we deal with the tarballs on the ftp servers? (there's no > packages there). We only want the supported bindings in > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/bindings/2.x/2.x.y/sources/
I'm not sure where you're going, everything in gtk# should be supported, or is there something you think isn't? -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list